点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
中宣部要求各地各新闻单位认真开展2023年“新春走基层”活动******
新华社北京1月5日电 近日，中宣部发出通知，要求各地各新闻单位认真开展“新春走基层”活动，组织编辑记者深入基层一线采访报道，不断增强“脚力、眼力、脑力、笔力”，全面反映各地统筹疫情防控和经济社会发展取得的积极成效，生动展示广大人民群众欢乐祥和过春节的喜人景象，齐心协力营造喜庆安康、昂扬向上的节日氛围。
通知要求，宣传各地区各部门学习贯彻党的二十大精神的新举措新进展新成效，跟踪报道党的二十大基层党代表学习贯彻党的二十大精神情况，鲜活反映基层群众自身工作生活的点滴变化和切身感受，持续推动党的二十大精神在基层落地生根，凝聚广大干部群众团结奋进力量。根据中央经济工作会议精神，客观准确报道各地努力克服疫情影响推进经济高质量发展情况，全面反映各地区各部门稳字当头、稳中求进的举措成效，充分挖掘过去一年中各地经济社会的发展亮点、重点行业企业应变克难的生动案例，宣传好我国创新引领持续加强、新产业新产品增势较好、新业态较为活跃等多方面积极因素，教育引导广大基层干部群众统一认识、迎难而上，坚定经济回稳向上的信心决心。全面反映各地区各部门优化调整疫情防控举措，积极解决春节期间群众就医用药、特殊人群保障等涉疫热点难点问题，采访节日期间各领域坚守疫情防控一线的基层党员干部，特别是医疗卫生、物流快递行业人员的动人故事，生动展示各地群众积极理性应对病毒感染、社区邻里之间互助友爱、企业复工复产、城市恢复烟火气的真实场景，不断鼓舞群众战胜疫情的信心。宣传各地区各部门强化节日市场保供稳价、加强煤电油气调节，确保春节市场平稳、群众温暖安全过节的有力举措；采访铁路班组、民航机组等交通运输行业工作人员，基层公安民警，消防救援队伍，边防哨所基层官兵等各行各业坚守岗位的奋斗者，讲述他们默默奉献、保障经济社会正常运转的感人故事；及时报道各级领导干部和社会各方面深入基层一线，特别是深入受灾地区、脱贫地区、乡村振兴重点帮扶县，对因疫因灾遇困群众和老弱病残等特殊群体开展帮扶救助、走访慰问和志愿服务活动的感人场景。报道各地区各部门结合优化疫情防控措施开展丰富多彩的节庆文化活动，大力弘扬社会主义核心价值观和中华优秀传统文化，持续宣传好各地组织的传统民俗、年俗活动，生动展示各地群众阖家团圆、高高兴兴过大年的热闹情景，反映各地基层群众文化生活的新趣味新时尚，突出地域特色和时代气息，展现中华文化多样性，充分彰显春节的文化魅力。
通知要求，认真组织专题专栏报道，中央和各省区市主要新闻单位在重要版面、重要时段、网站首页、客户端首屏等，统一开设“新春走基层”专栏，每天要保证一定的刊播总量；及时反映活动进展情况，活动结束后适时刊播综述、评论、记者感言等，反映编辑记者的心得体会。
通知指出，各新闻单位要根据各地疫情防控形势，科学合理统筹报道力量，充分调动编辑记者参与的积极性、主动性；坚持“短实新”报道文风，多用群众语言、百姓视角，客观平实反映基层群众关心的话题、身边发生的故事；用好新兴传播技术和平台渠道，多采用短视频、微视频等群众喜闻乐见的传播形式，不断提升正能量。
《光明日报》（ 2023年01月06日 03版）
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
（文图：赵筱尘 巫邓炎） [责编：天天中] 阅读剩余全文（）  视觉焦点
大星彩票地图 |
)